Is not particularly original, I know.
I thought about 'The Time It's Personal' - because I'm going to be posting about the social/cultural changes caused by the rapid spread and take-up of personal media tools. But I don't know... a dodgy old film strapline didn't seem quite right for something that might eventually blunder its way toward academic respectability.
Maybe I'll save it for a book. You need something ironically shouty for books, I guess.
I went with PFEL, mainly because it's been identified as one of the guiding principles of modern, 'always on' media, and one of its key differentiating points compared to the products of the old style printing press.
Basically, the idea is that whereas old style newspapers spend a long time editing before they publish something, bloggers tend to get their ideas/stories out there first and then rely on a kind of collective edit being done by the blogosphere. Readers decide what's important, their choices are aggregated in various forms and used by/relied on by others.
Of course, that works best for the bigger A List blogs, which are read by increasingly large numbers. But most blogs are read by a handful of people, if that. In theory, if something good appears on one of these, it can find its way to a large readership, in a way that just wasn't possible before.
But generally, I imagine the reality for most is different - probably closer to 'Publish First, Edit Never'.
The other reason I chose it is because it seems like the exact opposite of the way things generally work in academia, where you do your research, which is then reviewed and edited extensively before it's finally published. Nothing wrong with that. It's a guarantee of sorts.
But this blog will, I hope, work in a different way. The idea is to test out ideas, to discuss them with whoever drops by here, whether they're academics or not...
Again, there's nothing radical or deeply original about all this. It seems to me there's an awful lot of people working at universities and colleges doing similar things already. I wrote about a few of them last year in The Guardian. But given that I'm new to academia, this seems like the right way to do my research for now. Perhaps in a while, when I see how things work, I might change.
But for the moment, publish first, no matter how off beam or daft the ideas might be, then edit later, with the help of wiser, more informed heads than mine.
Recent Comments